Solutions · Recruiting & staffing

A placement is worth 500 CVs.

Candidates and clients flood your forms — but fees come from the few who place. PipeValue feeds placement probability and fee value back to Google & Meta, so your budget finds the profiles that bill.

No setup fee · 15-minute setup · Cancel anytime
The problem

Volume looks healthy. Placements don't follow.

Staffing funnels drown in unqualified applications and ghost candidates. Platforms optimizing on “application submitted” buy you more of exactly that.

  • Ghost candidates who never answer the first call
  • Wrong skills, wrong geography, wrong availability
  • Cost per application drops, cost per placement climbs
The fix

Bid on billable profiles.

PipeValue scores every registration on placement odds and expected fee.

  • Value from skills, seniority, availability, market demand
  • Placements and margins recalibrate the model
  • Works for candidate and client-side acquisition
Your value model

Proven on 200,000+ real staffing leads.

This is the vertical PipeValue was battle-tested on: a European staffing platform scoring every registration and streaming values to Google and Meta — with a measured 2.6× value lift on its top decile.

Example — staffing funnel value tiers

Value ≈ P(placement) × expected fee, per profile.

Tested at scale: 200k+ leads scored, 2.6× value lift on the top segment.

Values stream to the platforms in real time — Smart Bidding and value optimization learn who is actually worth paying for.

200k+
real leads the model was proven on
2.6×
measured value lift, top decile
< 1 min
from registration to value sent
Built for recruiting & staffing

Built on real staffing data — not theory.

🧩

Score what recruiters see

Skills, seniority, availability, mobility, market demand — straight from your ATS or CRM fields.

Placement calibration

Values recalibrate on actual placements and fees, so the model tracks your market.

Fresh-candidate dispatch

In staffing, speed is the fee. Values reach Google & Meta seconds after registration.

🎯

Campaign bidding insights

See which job campaigns still buy applications instead of placements — and what to switch.

📊

Fee analytics

Value by channel, job family and campaign. Know where billable candidates come from.

🛡

Shadow mode

Validate against your placement history before sending a single value.

Plug in your stack

Works with the tools you already run.

One-click OAuth — or drop a CSV and let the AI map it. Setup guides for every pair:

FAQ

What staffing firms ask us.

Placements take weeks. What value do we send on day one?+

A predicted value at registration — skills × availability × market demand — so the platforms learn instantly. As placements close, the calibration loop corrects the model against actual fees.

Does it work for temp and perm?+

Both. Perm models value on expected fee; temp/contracting on expected margin over assignment duration. You can run separate value models per business line.

Our data lives in an ATS, not a CRM. Can we connect?+

If your ATS syncs to HubSpot, Salesforce or Pipedrive, connect that. Otherwise, start with a CSV export — the AI maps it in one click — while we add more sources.

Stop buying CVs. Start buying placements.

The model is proven on 200,000+ staffing leads. Plug in yours and watch the budget move to profiles that bill.

Start your 15-day free trial →